Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199060›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2022

Obtaining spatially resolved tumor purity maps using deep multiple instance learning in a pan-cancer study.

Mustafa Umit Oner, Jianbin Chen, Egor Revkov, Anne James, Seow Ye Heng, Arife Neslihan Kaya, Jacob Josiah Santiago Alvarez, Angela Takano, Xin Min Cheng, Tony Kiat Hon Lim and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct prognostic value of [Communications medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence-augmented histopathologic review using image analysis to optimize DNA yield from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mustafa Umit OnerBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138671, Singapore.
Jianbin ChenGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Egor RevkovGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Anne JamesDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Seow Ye HengDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Arife Neslihan KayaGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Jacob Josiah Santiago AlvarezGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Angela TakanoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Xin Min ChengDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Tony Kiat Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Daniel Shao Weng TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Weiwei ZhaiGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Anders Jacobsen SkanderupGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Wing-Kin SungSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117417, Singapore.
Hwee Kuan LeeBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore 138671, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor purity is the percentage of cancer cells within a tissue section. Pathologists estimate tumor purity to select samples for genomic analysis by manually reading hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained slides, which is tedious, time consuming, and prone to inter-observer variability. Besides, pathologists' estimates do not correlate well with genomic tumor purity values, which are inferred from genomic data and accepted as accurate for downstream analysis. We developed a deep multiple instance learning model predicting tumor purity from H&E-stained digital histopathology slides. Our model successfully predicted tumor purity in eight The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts and a local Singapore cohort. The predictions were highly consistent with genomic tumor purity values. Thus, our model can be utilized to select samples for genomic analysis, which will help reduce pathologists' workload and decrease inter-observer variability. Furthermore, our model provided tumor purity maps showing the spatial variation within sections. They can help better understand the tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

computational pathologydeep learningdigital histopathologydigital pathologygenomic sequencingmultiple instance learningspatial omicstumor microenvironmenttumor puritywhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID35199060
PMCPMC8848022
OpenAlexW4225982186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.