ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022
Uses and abuses of the neuropsychological assessment in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy surgery candidates.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of neuropsychology in stereo-EEG: A narrative review.Epilepsia open · 2025Review
- Editorial.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent guidelines from the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) delineating the role of the neuropsychologist in the assessment of epilepsy surgery patients stress the collaborative contribution neuropsychologists should make to seizure characterization, lateralization and localization in the pre-surgical setting. The role they should play in the comprehensive counselling of surgical candidates, including exploration of the patient's expectations of surgical treatment is also mandated. In this paper we present two contrasting case studies which illustrate the importance of these roles and the impact they can have on patient outcomes. In Case A we describe the patient journey of a 69-year-old women with left hippocampal sclerosis and concordant neurophysiology and seizure semiology. We present the series of discussions and decisions which led her to reject the surgical option following a detailed exploration of her motivations for surgery and the likely cognitive consequences of the procedure. In Case B we describe the series of errors and omissions which led to the failure of a clinical team to correctly interpret and integrate neuropsychological findings into the larger clinical picture of a 19-year-old woman with a seven year history of seizures. These errors ultimately culminated in the patient undergoing a right temporal lobe resection to treat psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). The extent of integration of the data from the clinical neuropsychological assessment in the full presurgical evaluation was critical in determining the outcomes in both of these cases. Surgery did not solve Case B's problems and left her with the lifelong cognitive vulnerabilities that are associated with unilateral temporal lobe resection. In contrast, Case A was a good surgical candidate, but comprehensive integration of the neuropsychological findings into the larger clinical picture established that surgery was not the best solution to the problem she wished to solve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.