Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198928›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2022

Novel machine learning models outperform risk scores in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Vicki Wing-Ki Hui, Qingxiong Tan, Jingwen Xu, Hye Won Lee, Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip, Baoyao Yang, Yee-Kit Tse, Chong Yin, Fei Lyu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Interpretation of key updates of the 2026 version of the APASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Grace Lai-Hung WongMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Vicki Wing-Ki HuiMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Qingxiong TanDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jingwen XuDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Hye Won LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Terry Cheuk-Fung YipMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Baoyao YangDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Yee-Kit TseMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Chong YinDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Fei LyuDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jimmy Che-To LaiMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Grace Chung-Yan LuiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Henry Lik-Yuen ChanMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Pong-Chi YuenDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Vincent Wai-Sun WongMedical Data Analytic Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAccurate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk prediction facilitates appropriate surveillance strategy and reduces cancer mortality. We aimed to derive and validate novel machine learning models to predict HCC in a territory-wide cohort of patients with chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) using data from the Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Lab (HADCL).

methodsThis was a territory-wide, retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients with CVH in Hong Kong in 2000-2018 identified from HADCL based on viral markers, diagnosis codes, and antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B and/or C. The cohort was randomly split into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Five popular machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression, ridge regression, AdaBoost, decision tree, and random forest, were performed and compared to find the best prediction model.

resultsA total of 124,006 patients with CVH with complete data were included to build the models. In the training cohort (n = 86,804; 6,821 HCC), ridge regression (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.842), decision tree (0.952), and random forest (0.992) performed the best. In the validation cohort (n = 37,202; 2,875 HCC), ridge regression (AUROC 0.844) and random forest (0.837) maintained their accuracy, which was significantly higher than those of HCC risk scores: CU-HCC (0.672), GAG-HCC (0.745), REACH-B (0.671), PAGE-B (0.748), and REAL-B (0.712) scores. The low cut-off (0.07) of HCC ridge score (HCC-RS) achieved 90.0% sensitivity and 98.6% negative predictive value (NPV) in the validation cohort. The high cut-off (0.15) of HCC-RS achieved high specificity (90.0%) and NPV (95.6%); 31.1% of patients remained indeterminate.

conclusionsHCC-RS from the ridge regression machine learning model accurately predicted HCC in patients with CVH. These machine learning models may be developed as built-in functional keys or calculators in electronic health systems to reduce cancer mortality. LAY SUMMARY: Novel machine learning models generated accurate risk scores for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. HCC ridge score was consistently more accurate than existing HCC risk scores. These models may be incorporated into electronic medical health systems to develop appropriate cancer surveillance strategies and reduce cancer death.

Indexed as

aHR, adjusted hazard ratioALT, alanine aminotransferaseanti-HCV, antibody to hepatitis C virusAntiviral treatmentAPRI, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio indexAUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curveCDARS, Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting SystemCHB, chronic hepatitis BCHC, chronic hepatitis CCI, confidence intervalsCirrhosisCVH, chronic viral hepatitisDM, diabetes mellitusHADCL, Hospital Authority Data Collaboration LabHBeAg, hepatitis B e antigenHBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigenHBV, hepatitis B virusHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Clinical ModificationLiver cancerMortalityNA, nucleos(t)ide analogueRS, ridge scoreWHO, World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID35198928
PMCPMC8844233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.