Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198914›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Biofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel for the aetiological diagnosis of central nervous system infections: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Juliana Trujillo-Gómez, Sofia Tsokani, Catalina Arango-Ferreira, Santiago Atehortúa-Muñoz, Maria José Jimenez-Villegas, Carolina Serrano-Tabares, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Ivan D Florez

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07432113 (Prediction of Infectious Agents in the Biofire® FilmArray bioMérieux Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel Based on Clinical Syndrome and Cerebrospinal Fluid Parameters), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07432113 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of Infectious Agents in the Biofire® FilmArray bioMérieux Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel Based on Clinical Syndrome and Cerebrospinal Fluid Parameters: a Diagnostic Stewardship Proposal.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreRan2026 to 2029Enrolled182ConditionsMeningitis, Encephalitic Infection, Encephalitis, Meningitis, FungalArmsBiofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Suspected encephalitis in adults.Practical neurology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disseminated coccidioidomycosis in an immunocompetent traveler.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Juliana Trujillo-GómezDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, Antioquia 050001, Colombia.
Sofia TsokaniDepartment of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, PO Box: 1186, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
Catalina Arango-FerreiraDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, Antioquia 050001, Colombia.
Santiago Atehortúa-MuñozHospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Cl. 78b #69-240, Medellin 11001, Colombia.
Maria José Jimenez-VillegasDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, Antioquia 050001, Colombia.
Carolina Serrano-TabaresDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, Antioquia 050001, Colombia.
Areti-Angeliki VeronikiSt. Michael's Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, 8 Shuter St, Toronto, ON M5B 1A6, Canada.
Ivan D FlorezDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, Antioquia 050001, Colombia.
Hospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación · COHospital Pablo Tobon Uribe · COSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversidad Pontificia Bolivariana · COUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis(FA/ME) panel brings benefits in clinical practice, but its diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the DTA of FA/ME for the aetiological diagnostic in patients with suspected central nervous system(CNS) infection.

methodsWe performed a systematic review with DTA meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020139285). We searched Embase, Medline (Ovid), and Web of Science from inception until September 1st, 2021. We assessed the study-level risk of bias with the QUADAS-2 tool and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the synthesised evidence. We included studies that simultaneously measured the reference test (CSF/blood culture for bacteria, and specific polymerase chain reaction for viruses) and the FA/ME in patients with suspected CNS infection. We performed random-effects bivariate meta-analysis models of combined sensitivity and specificity using CSF/blood cultures(reference test 1) and a final diagnosis adjudication based on clinical/laboratory criteria (reference test 2).

findingsWe included 19 studies (11,351 participants). For all bacteria with reference test 1 (16 studies/6183 patients) sensitivity was estimated at 89·5% (95%CI 81·1-94·4), and specificity at 97·4% (95%CI 94-98·9). With reference test 2 (15 studies/5,524 patients), sensitivity was estimated at 92·1%(95%CI 86·8-95·3) and specificity at 99.2(95%CI 98·3-99·6) For herpes simplex virus-2(HSV-2), enteroviruses, and Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV), we obtained sensitivities between 75·5 and 93·8%, and specificities above 99% (reference test 1). Certainty of the evidence was low.

interpretationFA/ME may have acceptable-to-high sensitivities and high specificities for identifying bacteria, especially for

fundingNone.

Indexed as

CNS infectionDiagnostic accuracyEncephalitisFilm arrayMeningitisMeta-analysisMultiplex PCR

Identifiers

PMID35198914
PMCPMC8851290
OpenAlexW4213337952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.