Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198848›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2022

Fake news blues: A GUS staining protocol to reduce false-negative data.

Lauren K Dedow, Emily Oren, Siobhan A Braybrook

Open access · goldAbstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Identification of the CaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of Transformed Plants by GUS Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren K DedowDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-8508
Emily OrenDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-4713
Siobhan A BraybrookDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-5580
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The β-glucuronidase gene,

Indexed as

dark‐grown hypocotylsGUS stainmarker geneβ‐glucuronidase

Identifiers

PMID35198848
PMCPMC8842172
OpenAlexW4213040821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.