ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Oral anxiolytics prior to routine resident cataract surgery eliminate need for intravenous sedation at a Veterans Affairs Hospital.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with satisfaction with oral sedation during ophthalmic surgeries.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Trial
- The Efficacy and Safety of Diazepam for Intraoperative Blood Pressure Stabilization in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy Under Nerve Block Anesthesia: A Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Trial
- Anesthetic options for Rezūm water vapor therapy Is minimal sedation tolerable for a minimally invasive procedure?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the frequency of intraoperative intravenous sedation administration during routine resident-performed cataract surgery among patients receiving pre-operative oral sedation at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and its impact on patient safety and system cost.
methodsRetrospective review of all resident-performed cataract surgeries performed at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 2013 and 2017. Cases monitored by a registered nurse were included. Combined cases and cases monitored by an anesthesia provider were excluded. Pre-operative placement of an intravenous (IV) catheter, administration of intra-operative IV sedation, oral diazepam administration, anesthesia type, conditions for administering intraoperative IV medication, and cost of IV catheter placement were recorded.
resultsOf 1025 patient cases included for analysis, 972 received pre-operative diazepam (94.9%) and 1017 (99.3%) had IV catheters placed. One patient received a planned dose of IV methylprednisolone. Zero patients received supplemental intraoperative IV sedation. The estimated materials cost of unused IV catheters was $10,668 over 2 years.
conclusionsPre-operative IV catheter placement may not be necessary in patients undergoing routine resident cataract surgery with pre-operative oral sedation. Discontinuation of routine IV placement may improve patient satisfaction and decrease health care costs without compromising patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.