Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198628›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Treatment of pulmonary hypertension associated with COPD: a systematic review.

Ragdah Arif, Arjun Pandey, Ying Zhao, Kyle Arsenault-Mehta, Danya Khoujah, Sanjay Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ragdah ArifRespirology Division, Dept of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-5974
Arjun PandeyFaculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ying ZhaoSouthwest Ontario Pulmonary Hypertension Clinic, Division of Respirology, Dept of Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, Schulich Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Kyle Arsenault-MehtaFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Danya KhoujahDept of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sanjay MehtaSouthwest Ontario Pulmonary Hypertension Clinic, Division of Respirology, Dept of Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, Schulich Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-1056
Western University · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (COPD-PH) is an increasingly recognised condition which contributes to worsening dyspnoea and poor survival in COPD. It is uncertain whether specific treatment of COPD-PH, including use of medications approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), improves clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses potential benefits and risks of therapeutic options for COPD-PH. We searched Medline and Embase for relevant publications until September 2020. Articles were screened for studies on treatment of COPD-PH for at least 4 weeks in 10 or more patients. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently in duplicate. When possible, relevant results were pooled using the random effects model. Supplemental long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) mildly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), slowed progression of PH, and reduced mortality, but other clinical or functional benefits were not assessed. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors significantly improved systolic PAP (pooled treatment effect -5.9 mmHg; 95% CI -10.3, -1.6), but had inconsistent clinical benefits. Calcium channel blockers and endothelin receptor antagonists had limited haemodynamic, clinical, or survival benefits. Statins had limited clinical benefits despite significantly lowering systolic PAP (pooled treatment effect -4.6 mmHg; 95% CI -6.3, -2.9). This review supports guideline recommendations for LTOT in hypoxaemic COPD-PH patients as well as recommendations against treatment with PAH-targeted medications. Effective treatment of COPD-PH depends upon research into the pathobiology and future high-quality studies comprehensively assessing clinically relevant outcomes are needed.

Identifiers

PMID35198628
PMCPMC8859503
OpenAlexW3207907481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.