Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198466›Full record

ArticleIndian dermatology online journal

RegiSCAR DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) Validation Scoring System and Japanese Consensus Group Criteria for Atypical Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome (DiHS): A Comparative Analysis.

Sarita Sasidharanpillai, Kidangazhiathmana Ajithkumar, Pulpadathil Jishna, Anza Khader, Kollarukandy Vijayan Anagha, Manikoth Payyanadan Binitha, Anuradha Thalian Chathoth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Severe Toxicodermia due to Apalutamide: A Case Report of DRESS in an Elderly Adult.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluation of pediatric patients with drug allergy confirmed by in vivo diagnostic tests.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Empagliflozin-related DRESS syndrome.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of Anticonvulsant-Induced Leukocytosis: A Review of Evidence for Carbamazepine, Lamotrigine, and Phenobarbital.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarita SasidharanpillaiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Kidangazhiathmana AjithkumarDepartment of Dermatology, Govt. Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Pulpadathil JishnaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Anza KhaderDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Kollarukandy Vijayan AnaghaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Manikoth Payyanadan BinithaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Anuradha Thalian ChathothJunior Administrative Medical Officer, Health Services Department, Thamarassery Taluk Hospital, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDrug reaction with eosinphilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS) represent the same spectrum of a drug reaction.

aimsTo compare the clinical profile of patients diagnosed as definite/probable DRESS by the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) scoring system and as atypical DiHS by Japanese consensus group criteria. SETTINGS AND

designWe did a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included patients who satisfied the criteria for definite/probable DRESS and/or atypical DiHS and who received inpatient care in our department from January 2011 to December 2018. We compared the clinical and laboratory findings in patients diagnosed by the two criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Pearson Chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of patients with severe reactions diagnosed by the RegiSCAR DRESS validation scoring system and the Japanese consensus group criteria.

resultsAmong the 390 case records reviewed, 138 patients could be classified as definite/probable DRESS and/or atypical DiHS. Japanese criteria did not diagnose atypical DiHS in 88/137 (64.2%) patients with definite/probable DRESS. RegiSCAR scoring system made a diagnosis of definite/probable DRESS in 49/50 (98%) patients with atypical DiHS. A total of 58/138 (42%) patients had a severe reaction. RegiSCAR scoring system diagnosed 57/58 (98.3%) patients with severe reaction as definite/probable DRESS. A total of 32/58 (55.2%) patients with severe reactions were diagnosed as atypical DiHS. The difference was statistically significant (<0.001).

conclusionJapanese criteria for atypical DiHS showed reduced sensitivity to diagnose definite/probable DRESS, and this included more than 40% of patients with severe DRESS.

Indexed as

Atypical drug-induced hypersensitivity syndromedrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptomsJapanese consensus group criteriaRegiSCAR DRESS validation scoring systemsevere reaction

Identifiers

PMID35198466
PMCPMC8809161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.