ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
The Clinical Characteristics, Putative Drugs, and Optimal Management of 62 Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and/or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prevalence of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Complications due to Antiepileptic Drug Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive value of a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis (SCORTEN) factors for in-hospital mortality in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Factors Influencing Mortality in Patients with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Multicenter Study of 166 Patients.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor for successful treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe infection: a case series.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Safety assessment of sulfasalazine: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (SCAR): Clinical Pharmacologists' Viewpoint.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCase reviews of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as SJS/TEN provide useful insights for clinical characteristics, putative drugs, and management protocols. PATIENTS AND
methodsMedical charts of 62 (m:f- 20:42) patients with SJS/TEN hospitalized between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively for clinical attributes, putative drugs and their indications, extracutaneous complications, and therapeutic outcome. The diagnosis was clinical based on established criteria. WHO-UMC scale for reporting ADR and ALDEN algorithm score were used for causality assessment. Therapies were customized based on in-house resources and affordability.
resultsCases included were SJS (41.9%), SJS/TEN overlap (33.9%), and TEN (24.2%) aged 4-85 years. Complications included transaminitis (69.4%), lymphadenopathy (15.5%), septicemia (11.3%), and wound infections (4.8%). Aromatic anticonvulsants (37.1%), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (25.8%), antiretroviral drugs (12.9%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8.1%), antimicrobials (4.8%), and trihexyphenidyl (3.2%) were major putative drugs. The mean latent period was 16.6 days. The observed 8% mortality was because of primary comorbidities or multiorgan failure. Addition of fresh blood transfusion (BT, n = 11) or IVIg (n = 7) to systemic corticosteroids showed early relief in skin tenderness, improvement in general condition, and re-epithelialization. Only 16% of patients developed sequelae.
conclusionAromatic anticonvulsants, allopurinol, nevirapine, cotrimoxazole, paracetamol, and diclofenac remain the most implicated drugs. Sulfasalazine, leflunomide, ethambutol, and trihexyphenidyl were uncommon additions. A short course of high-dose dexamethasone in the early stage was useful. Addition of BT or IVIg provided rapid relief. Preexisting HIV disease, kidney disease, and sepsis remain important for in-hospital deaths. Retrospective study design and small number of cases remain major limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.