ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
Gynecologists Need to Be Vigilant-Two Case Reports of Intravascular Leiomyomatosis and Literature Review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary surgery for intravenous leiomyomatosis with inferior vena cava and/or intracardiac extension: a case series.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravascular leiomyomatosis is a rare benign lesion with malignant potential. The cases are sporadic. Most patients have no clinical symptoms, and the preoperative diagnostic rate is low. Case 1 was misdiagnosed, passively managed during operation, recurred quickly, and underwent a secondary operation. We learned lessons from case 1 and treated the case 2 patient differently. The case 2 patient had a good prognosis. We hope the report will be helpful to other gynecologists. CASE SUMMARY: Case 1: a 49-year-old woman complained of dysmenorrhea. Traditional ultrasound showed adenomyosis and a solid mass 6 * 3 cm in the right appendix. After routine examination, the patient underwent transabdominal total hysterectomy + bilateral salpingectomy + IVL tumor resection, with both ovaries kept. No medication was used after operation. Routine ultrasound was performed every 3 months. The disease recurred, and the patient underwent a secondary surgery 9 months after the first time. So far, 25 months after the secondary surgery, there is no sign of recurrence. Case 2: a 41-year-old woman underwent a routine body examination, where a left adnexal mass 7 cm was found. The patient underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and was diagnosed and prepared well preoperatively. The patient underwent transabdominal total hysterectomy + bilateral salpingectomy + IVL tumor resection. GnRH-a drugs were used after operation for 3 cycle. Now, there is no sign of recurrence after operation for 23 months.
conclusionThe incidence rate of IVL is low, and there are no typical clinical symptoms. It is easy to be ignored by gynecologists. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful to diagnose preoperatively and reduce misdiagnosis. Good preparation, full exploration of the pelvic and abdominal vessels, removal of lesions completely as much as possible, and anti-estrogen therapy after operation can reduce the recurrence of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.