Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198434›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Prior Local or Systemic Treatment: A Predictive Model Could Guide Clinical Decision-Making for Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Huai-Liang Wu, Yu-Jie Lu, Jian-Wei Li, Si-Yu Wu, Xiao-Song Chen, Guang-Yu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immunotherapies for locally aggressive cancers.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huai-Liang WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Jie LuDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Wei LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Si-Yu WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Song ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guang-Yu LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNRuijin Hospital · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLocoregional recurrent breast cancer indicates poor prognosis. No solid prediction model is available to predict prognosis and guide clinical management. Prior local treatment or systemic treatment remains controversial.

methodsLocoregional recurrent breast cancer patients operated in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were enrolled as a training cohort. An external validation cohort included breast cancer patients after locoregional recurrence from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University. A nomogram predicting overall survival after locoregional recurrence was established using multivariable Cox regression analysis while internal and external validation were performed to evaluate its calibration and discrimination.

resultsOverall, 346 and 96 breast cancer patients were included in the training cohort and the validation cohort separately. A nomogram was developed, including age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast surgery, pathology type, tumor size, lymph node status, hormonal receptor and Her-2 status, disease-free interval, and sites of locoregional recurrence. It had modest calibration and discrimination in the training cohort, internal validation and external validation (concordance index: 0.751, 0.734 and 0.722, respectively). The nomogram classified 266 and 80 patients into low and high-risk subgroups with distinctive prognosis. Local treatment after locoregional recurrence was associated with improved overall survival in low-risk group (

conclusionA nomogram based on clinicopathological factors can predict prognosis and identify low and high-risk patients. Local treatment is a prior choice for low-risk patients whereas systemic treatment needs to be considered for high-risk patients, warranting further validation and exploration.

Indexed as

breast cancerlocal treatmentlocoregional recurrencenomogramsystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID35198434
PMCPMC8858965
OpenAlexW4210524879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.