ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Validation of an automated cell counting method for cGMP manufacturing of human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of an automated total and viable cell counting for GMP-compliant production of human bone marrow stromal cells.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Validation of an Automated Fluorescence- and Image-Based Viable Cell Counting Method for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Drug Products.Biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Foundation model cascades enable zero-shot microscopy image analysis for cell therapy manufacturing.Cytotherapy · 2026Article
- Enhanced precision in cell culture analytics: leveraging artificial intelligence for unbiased and non-destructive assessment of cell growth and viability.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Noninvasive total counting of cultured cells using a home-use scanner with a pattern sheet.iScience · 2024Article
- Basics of advanced therapy medicinal product development in academic pharma and the role of a GMP simulation unit.Immuno-oncology technology · 2023Review
- Biopolymer-based emulsions for the stabilization of Trichoderma atrobrunneum conidia for biological control.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Challenges of Cell Counting in Cell Therapy Products.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) must be manufactured as advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) for innovative tissue replacement clinical applications. Yet, production of hiPSCs under current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) presents many hurdles, such as the large-scale cell expansion needed to reach therapeutically-relevant hiPSC doses. For the monitoring of this phase, a fast and reliable cell counting method should be used. Conventional manual cell counting by the hemocytometer method is dependent on the operator's expertise and is time-consuming. Therefore, automation of sample preparation and analysis is needed to improve precision and rapidity of hiPSC cell counting. We investigated whether an automated cell counting method could be validated for use with hiPSCs, in comparison with a reference cell counting method included in the European Pharmacopeia, 10th edition. The proposed method was the fluorescence imaging-based NucleoCounter NC-100 system, whereas the reference method was manual cell counting using a Bürker hemocytometer. The validation strategy complied with EudraLex cGMP regulations for ATMP manufacturing and ICH Q2(R1) indications for validation of analytical methods. The use of the NucleoCounter NC-100 system for automated cell counting was validated, focusing on accuracy, specificity, intra- and inter-operator reproducibility, range and linearity, showing higher precision than the manual method. The automated method can be used more effectively than the manual one for hiPSC cell counting. Thus, this piece of work paves the way for all cGMP facilities that want to pursue hiPSC manufacturing for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.