Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198410›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2022

A randomized factorial trial of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy: An 8-week program with or without extended support and booster lesson.

H D Hadjistavropoulos, V Peynenburg, D L Thiessen, M Nugent, E Karin, B F Dear, N Titov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of booster strategies to promote physical activity maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H D Hadjistavropoulos3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
V Peynenburg3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
D L Thiessen3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
M Nugent3737 Wascana Parkway, Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
E KarineCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
B F DeareCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
N TitovMindSpot Clinic, Australian Hearing Hub Building, eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) is effective, some patients suggest extended support post-treatment could improve care. In this randomized factorial trial, we examined the benefits of an 8-week therapist-assisted ICBT program offered with or without an optional 4-week extension of support (Factor 1) and with or without an optional booster lesson (Factor 2). Patients screened for ICBT for depression and/or anxiety were randomly assigned to the conditions (

Indexed as

Booster sessionsCognitive Behaviour TherapyInternet-deliveredTherapist supportTreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID35198410
PMCPMC8844810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.