Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35198159›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Comparison of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 after two doses of inactivated virus and BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines in kidney transplant.

Mariana Seija, Florencia Rammauro, José Santiago, Natalia Orihuela, Catherine Zulberti, Danilo Machado, Cecilia Recalde, Javier Noboa, Victoria Frantchez, Rossana Astesiano and 32 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana SeijaCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-104X
Florencia RammauroLaboratorio de Inmunovirología, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
José SantiagoCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Natalia OrihuelaCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Catherine ZulbertiCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Danilo MachadoCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Cecilia RecaldeCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Javier NoboaCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Victoria FrantchezCátedra de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Rossana AstesianoCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Federico YandiánCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ana GuerisoliCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Álvaro MorraCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Daniela CassinelliStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Cecilia CoelhoStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Belén de AramburuStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Paulina González-SevergniniStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Romina MorenoStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Aldana PippoloStudents of Scientific Methods 2, Medical Doctor Degree, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gabriela LópezDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Mónica LemosDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Lorena SomarivaDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Eliana LópezDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Soledad FumeroDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Carla OrihuelaDepartamento de Enfermería, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Rosalía RodríguezCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gonzalo AcuñaCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Victoria RabazaCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Nancy PergCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Rossana CorderoCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Cristina ReisfeldCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Paula OliveraCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Paola MonteroCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Cecilia NogueiraCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Catheryn NalerioCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Sergio OrihuelaCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Lilián CuriCentro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ema BurgstallerCentro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Oscar NoboaCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Otto PritschLaboratorio de Inmunovirología, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Marcelo NinCentro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Sergio BianchiDepartamento de Fisiopatología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1244-7411
Universidad de la República de Uruguay · UYMutualista Hospital Evangélico · UYHospital Italiano de Montevideo · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibody response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after mRNA or adenoviral vector-based vaccines is weak in kidney transplant (KT) patients. However, few studies have focused on humoral response after inactivated virus-based vaccines in KT. Here, we compare antibody response following vaccination with inactivated virus (CoronaVac®) and BNT162b2 mRNA.

methodsA national multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted. The study group was composed of patients from all KT centres in Uruguay, vaccinated between 1 and 31 May 2021 (CoronaVac®,

resultsOnly 29% of KT recipients showed seroconversion (36.5% BNT162b2, 27.8% inactivated virus, P = 0.248) in comparison with 100% in healthy control with either vaccine. Antibody levels against RBD were higher with BNT162b mRNA than with inactivated virus [median (interquartile range) 173 (73-554) and 29 (11-70) binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, P < 0.034] in KT and 10 times lower than healthy control [inactivated virus: 308 (209-335) and BNT162b2: 2638 (2608-3808) BAU/mL, P < 0.034]. In multivariate analysis, variables associated with negative humoral response were age, triple immunosuppression, estimated glomerular filtration rate and time post-KT.

conclusionSeroconversion was low in KT patients after vaccination with both platforms. Antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 were lower with inactivated virus than BNT162b mRNA. These findings support the need for strategies to improve immunogenicity in KT recipients after two doses of either vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19kidney transplantationSARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35198159
PMCPMC8755301
OpenAlexW4206629300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.