ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Construction of a Comprehensive Mental Health Evaluation System for Clinicians.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and Application of Dynamic Evaluation System and Educational Model of College Students' Mental Health.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo detect problems of mental health disorders early and actively by constructing a comprehensive evaluation system of mental health.
methodsThe evaluation system was constructed by the Minnesota personality questionnaire (MMPI), the personality questionnaire (EPQ), and the depression experience questionnaire (DEQ). Total 341 interns and residents in a general hospital were investigated with the questionnaire about psychological status, and the results were analyzed by SPSS22.0.
resultsThe KMO was 0.879, and the factor load of the seven factors was 0.49 to 0.856. The cumulative variance contribution reached 72.18%, and the overall consistency coefficient was 0.871. The relationship, emotional disorder, paranoia, reflection, and positive response were 0.893, 0.614, 0.867, 0.771 and 0.621, respectively. In this study, the mental health composite scores of all study subjects met a normal distribution, so level 3 scores of clinical interns and residents were established according to the deviation method.
conclusionThe constructed index system contains comprehensive indicators, good reliability efficiency, and a level 3 score, which helps individuals and hospitals to detect problems early, and provide guidance and advice for active intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.