ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Research on Object Detection of PCB Assembly Scene Based on Effective Receptive Field Anchor Allocation.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision-based object detection of PCB (printed circuit board) assembly scenes is essential in accelerating the intelligent production of electronic products. In particular, it is necessary to improve the detection accuracy as much as possible to ensure the quality of assembly products. However, the lack of object detection datasets in PCB assembly scenes is the key to restricting intellectual PCB assembly research development. As an excellent representative of the one-stage object detection model, YOLOv3 (you only look once version 3) mainly relies on placing predefined anchors on the three feature pyramid layers and realizes recognition and positioning using regression. However, the number of anchors distributed in each grid cell of different scale feature layers is usually the same. The ERF (effective receptive field) corresponding to the grid cell at different locations varies. The contradiction between the uniform distribution of fixed-size anchors and the ERF size range in different feature layers will reduce the effectiveness of object detection. Few people use ERF as a standard for assigning anchors to improve detection accuracy. To address this issue, firstly, we constructed a PCB assembly scene object detection dataset, which includes 21 classes of detection objects in three scenes before assembly, during assembly, and after assembly. Secondly, we performed a refined ERF analysis on each grid of the three output layers of YOLOv3, determined the ERF range of each layer, and proposed an anchor allocation rule based on the ERF. Finally, for the small and difficult-to-detect TH (through-holes), we increased the context information and designed improved-ASPP (Atrous spatial pyramid pooling) and channel attention joint module. Through a series of experiments on the object detection dataset of the PCB assembly scene, we found that under the framework of YOLOv3, anchor allocation based on ERF can increase mAP (mean average precision) from 79.32% to 89.86%. At the same time, our proposed method is superior to Faster R-CNN (region convolution neural network), SSD (single shot multibox detector), and YOLOv4 (you only look once version 4) in the balance of high detection accuracy and low computational complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.