Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197953›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Diana Luise, Paolo Bosi, Lena Raff, Laura Amatucci, Sara Virdis, Paolo Trevisi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of C17 fengycin B fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of Combining a Prebiotic (Autolyzed Yeast fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  14. A ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Effects of feeding aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  20. Effects ofTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana LuiseDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo BosiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lena RaffChr. Hansen, Animal Health and Nutrition, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Laura AmatucciDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara VirdisDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITChr. Hansen (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pressure to increasingly optimize the breeding of livestock monogastric animals resulted in antimicrobials often being misused in an attempt to improve growth performance and counteract diseases in these animals, leading to an increase in the problem of antibiotic resistance. To tackle this problem, the use of probiotics, also known as direct in-feed microbials (DFM), seems to be one of the most promising strategies. Among probiotics, the interest in

Indexed as

antibioticsBacillusbroilergut healthpigprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35197953
PMCPMC8859173
OpenAlexW4210421351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.