ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2021
Predicting Spike Features of Hodgkin-Huxley-Type Neurons With Simple Artificial Neural Network.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nociceptor sodium channels shape subthreshold phase, upstroke, and shoulder of action potentials.The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
- A faster way to model neuronal circuitry.eLife · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hodgkin-Huxley (HH)-type model is the most famous computational model for simulating neural activity. It shows the highest accuracy in capturing neuronal spikes, and its model parameters have definite physiological meanings. However, HH-type models are computationally expensive. To address this problem, a previous study proposed a spike prediction module (SPM) to predict whether a spike will take place 1 ms later based on three voltage values with intervals of 1 ms. Although SPM does well, it fails to evaluate the informative features of the spike. In this study, the feature prediction module (FPM) based on simple artificial neural network (ANN) was proposed to predict spike features including maximum voltage, minimum voltage, and dropping interval. Nine different HH-type models were adopted whose firing patterns cover most of the firing behaviors observed in the brain. Voltage and spike feature samples under constant external input current were collected for training and testing. Experiment results illustrated that the combination of SPM and FPM can accurately predict the spiking part of different HH-type models and can generalize to unseen types of input current. The combination of SPM and FPM may offer a possible way to simulate the action potentials of biological neurons with high accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.