Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197808›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

An evolutionary model of sensitive periods when the reliability of cues varies across ontogeny.

Nicole Walasek, Willem E Frankenhuis, Karthik Panchanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The epigenetic impacts of pubertal acceleration following early caregiver disruptions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Early life adversity has sex-dependent effects on survival across the lifespan in rhesus macaques.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Prenatal Stress and Maternal Role in Neurodevelopment.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prediction in the Aging Brain: Merging Cognitive, Neurological, and Evolutionary Perspectives.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adrenocortical Responses to Daily Stressors Are Calibrated by Early Life Adversity: An Investigation of the Adaptive Calibration Model.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
  16. An evolutionary model of sensitive periods when the reliability of cues varies across ontogeny.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole WalasekBehavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, 6525 GD Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4411-319X
Willem E FrankenhuisBehavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, 6525 GD Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Karthik PanchanathanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Missouri, 225 Swallow Hall Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive periods are widespread in nature, but their evolution is not well understood. Recent mathematical modeling has illuminated the conditions favoring the evolution of sensitive periods early in ontogeny. However, sensitive periods also exist at later stages of ontogeny, such as adolescence. Here, we present a mathematical model that explores the conditions that favor sensitive periods at later developmental stages. In our model, organisms use environmental cues to incrementally construct a phenotype that matches their environment. Unlike in previous models, the reliability of cues varies across ontogeny. We use stochastic dynamic programming to compute optimal policies for a range of evolutionary ecologies and then simulate developmental trajectories to obtain mature phenotypes. We measure changes in plasticity across ontogeny using study paradigms inspired by empirical research: adoption and cross-fostering. Our results show that sensitive periods only evolve later in ontogeny if the reliability of cues increases across ontogeny. The onset, duration, and offset of sensitive periods-and the magnitude of plasticity-depend on the specific parameter settings. If the reliability of cues decreases across ontogeny, sensitive periods are favored only early in ontogeny. These results are robust across different paradigms suggesting that empirical findings might be comparable despite different experimental designs.

Indexed as

cuesdevelopmentevolutionmodelingphenotypic plasticitysensitive periodsstochastic dynamic programming

Identifiers

PMID35197808
PMCPMC8857937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.