Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197807›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments.

Ossi Nokelainen, Francisko de Moraes Rezende, Janne K Valkonen, Johanna Mappes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heterozygote advantage and pleiotropy contribute to intraspecific color trait variability.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  9. Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ossi NokelainenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0278-6698
Francisko de Moraes RezendeDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-8464
Janne K ValkonenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-6612
Johanna MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-5629
University of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A big question in behavioral ecology is what drives diversity of color signals. One possible explanation is that environmental conditions, such as light environment, may alter visual signaling of prey, which could affect predator decision-making. Here, we tested the context-dependent predator selection on prey coloration. In the first experiment, we tested detectability of artificial visual stimuli to blue tits (

Indexed as

behaviorcognitioncolor visionpsychologyreceptor-noise-limited modelsignal

Identifiers

PMID35197807
PMCPMC8857938
OpenAlexW3206579112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.