Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197716›Full record

ArticlePRIMUS : problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies2022

Supporting

Aasakiran Madamanchi, Madison Thomas, Alejandra Magana, Randy Heiland, Paul Macklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRIMUS : problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aasakiran MadamanchiORCID 0000-0003-1047-6646
Madison Thomas

Funding

Multiscale systems biology modeling to exploit tumor-stromal metabolic crosstalk in colorectal cancerU01CA232137 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FINLEY, STACEY DELERIA, MACKLIN, PAUL T · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing awareness of the need for mathematics and computing to quantitatively understand the complex dynamics and feedbacks in the life sciences. Although several institutions and research groups are conducting pioneering multidisciplinary research, communication and education across fields remain a bottleneck. The opportunity is ripe for using education research-supported mechanisms of cross-disciplinary training at the intersection of mathematics, computation, and biology. This case study uses the computational apprenticeship theoretical framework to describe the efforts of a computational biology lab to rapidly prototype, test, and refine a mentorship infrastructure for undergraduate research experiences. We describe the challenges, benefits, and lessons learned, as well as the utility of the computational apprenticeship framework in supporting computational/math students learning and contributing to biology, and biologists in learning computational methods. We also explore implications for undergraduate classroom instruction and cross-disciplinary scientific communication.

Indexed as

Computational apprenticeshipcomputational biologyengineering educationmathematical biologymultidisciplinary researchopen sourceSTEM educationundergraduate research

Identifiers

PMID35197716
PMCPMC8863170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.