Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197695›Full record

ReviewUrology annals

Does ureteral access sheath have an impact on ureteral injury?

Mehmet Kazim Asutay, Marco Lattarulo, Despoina Liourdi, Abdulrahman Mohamed Al-Aown, Konstantinos Pagonis, Noor Nedal, Amelia Pietropaolo, Esteban Emiliani, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fluoroscopy Is Essential in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.International journal of clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Ureteral access sheath. Does it improve the results of flexible ureteroscopy? A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Mehmet Kazim AsutayDepartment of Urology, Sanliurfa Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Marco LattaruloDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Despoina LiourdiDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Abdulrahman Mohamed Al-AownDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Konstantinos PagonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Noor NedalDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Esteban EmilianiYoung Academic Urologists-Endourology and Lithiasis Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
University of Patras · GRAgios Andreas Hospital · GRArmed Forces Hospital Southern RegionAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITEuropean Association of Urology · NLPuigvert Foundation · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present a well-organized review about ureteral access sheath impact on ureteral injury. MATERIALS AND

methodsSystemic search on literature was done. Total of 3766 studies observed by two urologists and results were unified. A Prisma diagram was used for eliminating irrelevant studies and at the end of elimination process 28 studies were found eligible for this review.

resultsNot only clinical studies but also comparative experimental animal studies show that there is no significant data to claim that ureteral access sheath insertion causes more ureteral injury. Pre-stented patients were found to be at lower risk for ureteral injury. Risk of progression to ureteral injury seems to be low even if ureteral injury occurs with insertion of ureteral access sheath.

conclusionSummary of studies' results indicate that use of ureteral access sheath doesn't increase ureteral injury. This review may help understanding safety profile of ureteral access sheath on evidence-based level. There is not enough data to make a statement that ureteral access sheath prevents ureteral injury.

Indexed as

Retrograde intrarenal surgeryureteral access sheathureteral injuryureteral strictureureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35197695
PMCPMC8815358
OpenAlexW4205743060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.