ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Clinical Presentations and Semen Characteristics of Men Attending the Secondary Referral Infertility Clinic at Mumbai, India.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small RNA profile alterations as a potential mechanism for sperm quality improvement following varicocelectomy.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and temporal trends of male infertility in Egypt (2012-2022): Analysis of 3,037 consecutive cases.Arab journal of urology · 2026Article
- Sperm DNA methylation landscape in infertile men with clinical varicocele: unravelling the treatment effect.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Interrogating erectile dysfunction and evaluating novel therapeutic frontiers, with emphasis on stem cell strategies.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited information is available on the aetiology and semen profiles of male infertility in Indian population.
aimThe aim of this study is to study the clinical and semen characteristics of men attending the infertility clinic and also to understand the impact of World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 reference values on the diagnosis of male infertility. SETTING AND
designA retrospective study evaluating the medical case records (January 2005 to December 2015, [ MATERIALS AND
methodsThe aetiology was classified based on the andrology evaluation and other investigations. Semen profiles were compared during the years 2005-2010 and 2011-2015 using WHO 1999 and WHO 2010 criteria, respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Chi-square and Mann-Whitney
resultsThe aetiology of male infertility was determined in 62% of the men; while the cause remained undetermined in 38%. Varicocele (25%), urogenital infections (10%), sexual dysfunctions (8%) and vas aplasia (8%) were identified as major aetiologies in our cohort. Men with sexual dysfunctions and vas aplasia were significantly higher during the years 2011-2015 as compared to 2005-2010. Men having normozoospermia (10%) and azoospermia (3%) were increased, whereas those having oligoasthenozoospermia (17%) were reduced in 2011-2015 as compared to 2005-2010. According to WHO 1999 criteria , 12-15% of men showed abnormal semen profiles. The semen parameters of these men became normal on using WHO 2010 reference values.
conclusionsVaricocele is the most common aetiology in infertile men. Idiopathic infertility was seen in a higher proportion among the infertile men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.