ReviewJournal of human reproductive sciences
Evolution and Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders in Assisted Reproduction - A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing: decoding cellular heterogeneity for breakthroughs in cancer, reproduction, and beyond.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Integrating Current Clinical Practice with Future Therapeutic and Diagnostic Horizons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Insufficient Number of Informative SNPs in a Preclinical Karyomapping Test for PGT-M Depends on the Reference Selected.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Family misfortune caused by hereditary bias: a reflection on mitochondrial disease diagnosis in a family.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Molecular autopsy by proxy: relevance for genetic counseling in rare genetic disorders.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for embryos predisposed to hereditary cancer: Possibilities and challenges.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2024Review
- Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: A literature review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Review
- Genetic counseling for pre-implantation genetic testing of monogenic disorders (PGT-M).Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic disorders and assisted reproductive technology have evolved and progressed in tandem. PGT started with single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by fluorescent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.