Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197635›Full record

ArticleNature2022

A biophysical account of multiplication by a single neuron.

Lukas N Groschner, Jonatan G Malis, Birte Zuidinga, Alexander Borst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distribution and voltage dependence of ion channels shape single-neuron computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential temporal filtering in the fly optic lobe.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024
    Review
  18. Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas N Groschner *Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany. groschner@neuro.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-0232
Jonatan G Malis *Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-6248
Birte ZuidingaMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-3747
Alexander BorstMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany. borst@neuro.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5537-8973

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear, multiplication-like operations carried out by individual nerve cells greatly enhance the computational power of a neural system

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBiophysicsNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID35197635
PMCPMC8891015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.