ArticleNature2022
The giant plan to track diversity in research journals.
Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Trial
- Paying peer reviewers: benefits, risks, and challenges.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- WEIRD but Also Inconsistent: An Analysis of the Reporting Practices of Participant Samples Across Five Areas of Psychology.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026Article
- Disparities in paediatric radiology research publications from low- and lower middle-income countries: a time for change.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- A bibliometric analysis of geographic disparities in the authorship of leading medical journals.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Atopic Dermatitis Across Shades of Skin.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Review
- How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought.Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2023Article
- Outcomes of COVID-19 manuscripts submitted to the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective audit of author gender and person of colour status.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, and receive fewer citations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- A critical look at the practice and culture of science with calls to action.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- New considerations of health disparities within allergy and immunology.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Review
- The SCOPE framework - implementing ideals of responsible research assessment.F1000Research · 2023Article
- The illusion of inclusion: contextual behavioral science and the Black community.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Gender equity in health research publishing in Africa.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Women Academics' Intersectional Experiences of Policy Ineffectiveness in the European Context.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Toward the advancement of equity in scientific publishing.The American psychologistArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35197624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.