ArticleScientific reports2022
Lowering the setting value of the esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection device enabled tissue damage control in vitro porcine model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- ENDOCUT Q coagulation fraction is associated with esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Use of rebamipide solution as a submucosal injection material to prevent esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Animal study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the complications of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is postoperative stricture formation. Stenosis formation is associated with inflammation and fibrosis in the healing process. We hypothesized that the degree of thermal damage caused by the device is related to stricture formation. We aimed to reveal the relationship between thermal damage and setting value of the device. We energized a resected porcine esophagus using the ESD device (Flush Knife 1.5). We performed 10 energization points for 1 s, 3 s, and 5 s at four setting values of the device. We measured the amount of current flowing to the conducted points and the temperature and evaluated the effects of thermal damage pathologically. As results, the mean highest temperatures for 1 s were I (SWIFT Effect3 Wat20): 61.19 °C, II (SWIFT Effect3 Wat30): 77.28 °C, III (SWIFT Effect4 Wat20): 94.50 °C, and IV (SWIFT Effect4 Wat30): 94.29 °C. The mean heat denaturation areas were I: 0.84 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.