Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis.

Giovanni Putame, Mara Terzini, Fabrizio Rivera, Maeruan Kebbach, Rainer Bader, Cristina Bignardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploration of the Advanced VIVOBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni PutameDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy. giovanni.putame@polito.it.
Mara TerziniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio RiveraOrthopaedic Surgery Department, SS Annunziata Savigliano Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN1, Savigliano, Italy.
Maeruan KebbachDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Cristina BignardiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Polytechnic University of Turin · ITUniversity of Rostock · DEOspedale SS. Annunziata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, several configurations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants are commercially available whose designs resulted from clinical and biomechanical considerations. Previous research activities led to the development of the so-called medial-pivot (MP) design. However, the actual benefits of the MP, with respect to other prosthesis designs, are still not well understood. The present work compares the impact of two insert geometries, namely the ultra-congruent (UC) and medial-pivot (MP), on the biomechanical behaviour of a bicondylar total knee endoprosthesis. For this purpose, a multibody model of a lower limb was created alternatively integrating the two implants having the insert geometry discretized. Joint dynamics and contact pressure distributions were evaluated by simulating a squat motion. Results showed a similar tibial internal rotation range of about 3.5°, but an early rotation occurs for the MP design. Furthermore, the discretization of the insert geometry allowed to efficiently derive the contact pressure distributions, directly within the multibody simulation framework, reporting peak pressure values of 33 MPa and 20 MPa for the UC and MP, respectively. Clinically, the presented findings confirm the possibility, through a MP design, to achieve a more natural joint kinematics, consequently improving the post-operative patient satisfaction and potentially reducing the occurrence of phenomena leading to the insert loosening.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationKineticsKnee ProsthesisLigamentsModels, BiologicalMusclesProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularSoftwareTibia

Identifiers

PMID35197496
PMCPMC8866513
OpenAlexW4214714712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.