Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197490›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Interventional neurorehabilitation for promoting functional recovery post-craniotomy: a proof-of-concept.

Anujan Poologaindran, Christos Profyris, Isabella M Young, Nicholas B Dadario, Syed A Ahsan, Kassem Chendeb, Robert G Briggs, Charles Teo, Rafael Romero-Garcia, John Suckling and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Brain Connectome for Clinical Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Parcellation-Based Connectivity Model of the Judgement Core.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anujan PoologaindranBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christos ProfyrisNetcare Linksfield Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Isabella M YoungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas B DadarioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Syed A AhsanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kassem ChendebDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Robert G BriggsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Charles TeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Rafael Romero-GarciaBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
John SucklingBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michael E SughrueBrain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. sughruevs@gmail.com.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBNetcare Unitas Hospital · ZATuring Institute · GBUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is a highly plastic 'complex' network-it is highly resilient to damage and capable of self-reorganisation after a large perturbation. Clinically, neurological deficits secondary to iatrogenic injury have very few active treatments. New imaging and stimulation technologies, though, offer promising therapeutic avenues to accelerate post-operative recovery trajectories. In this study, we sought to establish the safety profile for 'interventional neurorehabilitation': connectome-based therapeutic brain stimulation to drive cortical reorganisation and promote functional recovery post-craniotomy. In n = 34 glioma patients who experienced post-operative motor or language deficits, we used connectomics to construct single-subject cortical networks. Based on their clinical and connectivity deficit, patients underwent network-specific transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) sessions daily over five consecutive days. Patients were then assessed for TMS-related side effects and improvements. 31/34 (91%) patients were successfully recruited and enrolled for TMS treatment within two weeks of glioma surgery. No seizures or serious complications occurred during TMS rehabilitation and 1-week post-stimulation. Transient headaches were reported in 4/31 patients but improved after a single session. No neurological worsening was observed while a clinically and statistically significant benefit was noted in 28/31 patients post-TMS. We present two clinical vignettes and a video demonstration of interventional neurorehabilitation. For the first time, we demonstrate the safety profile and ability to recruit, enroll, and complete TMS acutely post-craniotomy in a high seizure risk population. Given the lack of randomisation and controls in this study, prospective randomised sham-controlled stimulation trials are now warranted to establish the efficacy of interventional neurorehabilitation following craniotomy.

Indexed as

AgedAphasiaBrainBrain MappingConnectomeCraniotomyFemaleGliomaHemiplegiaHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationRecovery of FunctionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35197490
PMCPMC8866464
OpenAlexW4221002918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.