Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197485›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2022

An adjuvanted subunit SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccine provides protection against Covid-19 infection and transmission.

Kairat Tabynov, Nurkeldi Turebekov, Meruert Babayeva, Gleb Fomin, Toktassyn Yerubayev, Tlektes Yespolov, Lei Li, Gourapura J Renukaradhya, Nikolai Petrovsky, Kaissar Tabynov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Vaccine of SARS-CoV-2 S Protein RBD Induces Protective Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kairat TabynovInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nurkeldi TurebekovCentral Reference Laboratory, M. Aikimbayev National Scientific Center for Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-2611
Meruert BabayevaInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gleb FominInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3898
Toktassyn YerubayevCentral Reference Laboratory, M. Aikimbayev National Scientific Center for Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Tlektes YespolovInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Lei LiVaxine Pty Ltd and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Gourapura J RenukaradhyaCenter for Food Animal Health, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Wooster, OH, 44691, United States.
Nikolai PetrovskyVaxine Pty Ltd and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-5245
Kaissar TabynovInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Almaty, Kazakhstan. tabynov_81@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-1280
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University · KZFlinders University · AUKazakh Research Institute of Plant Protection and Quarantine · KZThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201800024C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant protein approaches offer major promise for safe and effective vaccine prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We developed a recombinant spike protein vaccine (called NARUVAX-C19) and characterized its ability when formulated with a nanoemulsion adjuvant to induce anti-spike antibody and T-cell responses and provide protection including against viral transmission in rodent. In mice, NARUVAX-C19 vaccine administered intramuscularly twice at 21-day interval elicited balanced Th1/Th2 humoral and T-cell responses with high titers of neutralizing antibodies against wild-type (D614G) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants. In Syrian hamsters, NARUVAX-C19 provided complete protection against wild-type (D614G) infection and prevented its transmission to naïve animals (n = 2/group) placed in the same cage as challenged animals (n = 6/group). The results contrasted with only weak protection seen with a monomeric spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) vaccine even when formulated with the same adjuvant. These encouraging results warrant the ongoing development of this COVID-19 vaccine candidate.

Identifiers

PMID35197485
PMCPMC8866462
OpenAlexW4220857027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.