Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197449›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Forecasting the outcome of spintronic experiments with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations.

Xing Chen, Flavio Abreu Araujo, Mathieu Riou, Jacob Torrejon, Dafiné Ravelosona, Wang Kang, Weisheng Zhao, Julie Grollier, Damien Querlioz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting tissue distribution and tumor delivery of nanoparticles in mice using machine learning models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xing ChenFert Beijing Institute, MIIT Key Laboratory of Spintronics, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Flavio Abreu AraujoInstitute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Croix du Sud 1, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7157-3197
Mathieu RiouUnité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Jacob TorrejonUnité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Dafiné RavelosonaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, Palaiseau, France.
Wang KangFert Beijing Institute, MIIT Key Laboratory of Spintronics, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Weisheng ZhaoFert Beijing Institute, MIIT Key Laboratory of Spintronics, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 100191, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-0404
Julie GrollierUnité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-4490
Damien QuerliozUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, Palaiseau, France. damien.querlioz@c2n.upsaclay.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-1008

Funding

Beijing Nova Program Z201100006820042China Scholarship Council (CSC) 201906020155EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 682955EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 715872Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Beijing Natural Science Foundation) 4202043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has an increasing impact to assist research, allowing, for example, the discovery of novel materials. Until now, however, these artificial intelligence techniques have fallen short of discovering the full differential equation of an experimental physical system. Here we show that a dynamical neural network, trained on a minimal amount of data, can predict the behavior of spintronic devices with high accuracy and an extremely efficient simulation time, compared to the micromagnetic simulations that are usually employed to model them. For this purpose, we re-frame the formalism of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations to the constraints of spintronics: few measured outputs, multiple inputs and internal parameters. We demonstrate with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations an acceleration factor over 200 compared to micromagnetic simulations for a complex problem - the simulation of a reservoir computer made of magnetic skyrmions (20 minutes compared to three days). In a second realization, we show that we can predict the noisy response of experimental spintronic nano-oscillators to varying inputs after training Neural Ordinary Differential Equations on five milliseconds of their measured response to a different set of inputs. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations can therefore constitute a disruptive tool for developing spintronic applications in complement to micromagnetic simulations, which are time-consuming and cannot fit experiments when noise or imperfections are present. Our approach can also be generalized to other electronic devices involving dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID35197449
PMCPMC8866480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.