Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197401›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2022

Frameless Stereotactic Biopsy with Intraoperative Computed Tomography "Assessment of Efficacy and Real Target Registration Error".

Naokado Ikeda, Yoshihide Katayama, Shinji Kawabata, Motomasa Furuse, Yuichiro Tsuji, Naosuke Nonoguchi, Ryokichi Yagi, Masahiro Kameda, Toshihiro Takami, Toshihiko Kuroiwa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naokado IkedaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Yoshihide KatayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Shinji KawabataDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Motomasa FuruseDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Yuichiro TsujiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Naosuke NonoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Ryokichi YagiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Masahiro KamedaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Toshihiro TakamiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Toshihiko KuroiwaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Masahiko WanibuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy (FSB) with navigation system has been widely used. We reported preliminary experience of FSB with intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) and examined the usefulness of this novel adjuvant technique and real target registration error (rTRE) of FSB. The FSB with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and iCT was performed on 10 patients. The gadolinium-enhanced lesions on magnetic resonance image were defined as the biopsy target. In the procedure, iCTs were scanned twice, for autoregistration of the navigation system and for confirmation of the position of the actual inserted biopsy needle. The red fluorescence of the samples was observed under excitation with violet-blue light through a low-cut filter of neurosurgical microscope. The distance between the planned target and the tip of the biopsy needle in the image of iCT was calculated in a workstation for the assessment of rTRE. The median volume of the target was 12.13 mL (0.06-39.15 mL). We performed the surgical procedure in a prone position in four patients. None to faint 5-ALA-induced fluorescence was observed in six samples. There existed no sampling errors. The mean target distance between the planned and real targets of the mean rTRE of FSB was 2.7 ± 0.56 mm. The real TRE of FSB was first reported and was larger than the reported rTRE exactly calculated from the fiducial registration error. iCT guarantees accurate tumor sampling with autoregistration regardless of the surgical position and prevents inaccurate biopsy to occur even with ALA fluorescence assistance.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeuronavigationAminolevulinic AcidBiopsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingStereotaxic TechniquesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAminolevulinic Acid5-aminolevulinic acidframeless stereotactic biopsyintraoperative computed tomographynavigation systemtarget registration error

Identifiers

PMID35197401
PMCPMC9093670
OpenAlexW4213185508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.