Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197344›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Randomised controlled trial testing the feasibility of an exercise and nutrition intervention for patients with ovarian cancer during and after first-line chemotherapy (BENITA-study).

Tabea Maurer, Matthias Hans Belau, Julia von Grundherr, Zoe Schlemmer, Stefan Patra, Heiko Becher, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Birgit-Christiane Zyriax, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Jenny Chang-Claude

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ovarian cancer and malnutrition: a literature review.Translational cancer research · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tabea MaurerCancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias Hans BelauMedical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2141-2162
Julia von GrundherrDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, BMT with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumour Center, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Zoe SchlemmerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan PatraCenter for Athletic Medicine (UKE Athleticum), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Heiko BecherMedical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-6667
Karl-Heinz SchulzCenter for Athletic Medicine (UKE Athleticum), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Birgit-Christiane ZyriaxMidwifery Science-Health Care Research and Prevention, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jenny Chang-ClaudeCancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany j.chang-claude@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-1971
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdvanced ovarian cancer is a severe disease with major side effects caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis, ascites and gastrointestinal involvement as well as exhaustive treatment like debulking surgery and combination chemotherapy. Two most frequently reported side effects are muscle wasting and malnutrition, leading to frailty, decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cancer-related fatigue (CRF). As muscle wasting and malnutrition often commence during first-line chemotherapy and develop progressively into a refractory state, an early intervention is warranted. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and acceptance of a combined exercise and nutrition intervention during and after first-line chemotherapy.

designThe pilot study was conducted as a monocentric 1:1 randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). Participants were divided by chance into IG or CG. Information on group allocation was conveyed to the study coordinator responsible for making an appointment with the patients for the baseline assessment as well as the physiotherapist and nutritionist responsible for the intervention and outcome assessment in both groups.

participantsEligibility criteria included women ≥18 years of age, diagnosed with ovarian cancer, tubal cancer or peritoneal cancer and primary or interval debulking, scheduled but not started adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and sufficient German-language skills.

interventionThe IG received a 12-month exercise and nutrition programme, the CG continued to follow usual care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were recruitment rate, adherence to intervention, completion rate and adverse events. In addition, in-person assessments (eg, HRQoL, CRF, muscle quality and function and dietary intake and quality) were conducted at baseline (T0, before chemotherapy), week 9 (T1, mid-chemotherapy), week 19 (T2, after completion of chemotherapy) and after 12 months of intervention (T3).

resultsOf 60 eligible patients, 15 patients signed informed consent (recruitment rate=25.0%) and were randomised into IG (n=8) and CG (n=7). Eleven participants completed the study (completion rate, 73.3%), one patient dropped out due to loss of interest, one due to poor health, one was lost to follow-up and one patient died.

conclusionThe BENITA (Bewegungs- und Ernährungsintervention bei Ovarialkrebs) study demonstrated the safety and acceptance of an exercise and nutrition intervention integrated into first-line therapy and follow-up care of ovarian cancer. A large multicentre RCT is planned to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention on HRQoL, CRF and survival and to establish means of implementation into oncology guidelines and clinic routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00013231.

Indexed as

MalnutritionOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialExerciseFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansadult oncologyepidemiologygynaecological oncology

Identifiers

PMID35197344
PMCPMC8867313
OpenAlexW4213415578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.