Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197187›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2022

Chronic Tinnitus.

Birgit Mazurek, Gerhard Hesse, Christian Dobel, Volker Kratzsch, Claas Lahmann, Heribert Sattel, Guideline group

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Music Therapy and Tinnitus Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birgit MazurekTinnitus Center, Charité-University Medical Center, Berlin; Tinnitus Clinic, Bad Arolsen Hospital; Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Jena; Department of Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, and Vestibular Disorders, VAMED Rehabilitation Hospital Bad Grönenbach; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Freiburg; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Rechts der Isar Hospital, Technical University of Munich.
Gerhard Hesse
Christian Dobel
Volker Kratzsch
Claas Lahmann
Heribert Sattel
Guideline group
Klinik für Psychosomatik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic tinnitus is a commonly occurring symptom of the auditory system. Epidemiological studies assume a lifetime prevalence in men and women of 3.5% for chronic tinnitus requiring treatment. Almost 25% of all Germans have experienced at least one episode of tinnitus. No causal therapy is yet available, but numerous treatment strategies are being pursued. Rigorous scientific assessment of these procedures is essential.

methodsFor this exhaustive revision of the German clinical practice guideline, the literature in the medical databases PubMed and Cochrane Library, including existing guidelines from various countries, was systematically searched using keywords on the topic of chronic tinnitus. On the basis of the revised guideline, a separate guideline was written in language accessible to patients.

resultsChronic tinnitus is often associated with hearing loss, but the mental distress caused by the ear noise is another crucial element. Apart from expert counseling, the recommended treatment comprises psychotherapeutic interventions, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy (with effect sizes of 0.54 to 0.91 for reduction of the tinnitus-related distress), and measures to improve the hearing. There is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of drug treatment, sound and music therapy, and neuromodulation (magnetic stimulation or electrostimulation).

conclusionAlongside thorough and sound diagnosis and counseling, the principal treatment options for chronic tinnitus are specific cognitive behavioral therapy and expert psychotherapeutic interventions on an individual or group basis. Future-preferably interdisciplinary-research should evaluate the long-term effects of the treatment options, with particular attention to psychosomatic comorbidity.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyHearing LossMusic TherapyTinnitusCounselingFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35197187
PMCPMC9342131
OpenAlexW4214742559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.