Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197146›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2022

A scoping review exploring reablement models of training and client assessment for older people in primary health care.

Marguerite Bramble, Sarah Young, Sarah Prior, Hazel Maxwell, Steve Campbell, Annette Marlow, Douglass Doherty

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping of Reablement Research - A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marguerite BrambleCharles Sturt University, School of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, Bathurst, 2795, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-1171
Sarah YoungUniversity of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3384-670X
Sarah PriorTasmanian School of Medicine, Cradle Coast Campus, Burnie, TAS, 7320Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-9141
Hazel MaxwellUniversity of Tasmania, School of Health Sciences, Rozelle Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0610-4698
Steve CampbellUniversity of Tasmania, School of Nursing, College of Health and Medicine, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS, 7250Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-8488
Annette MarlowUniversity of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-7497
Douglass DohertyFamily Based Care Tasmania, Chief Executive Officer, Family Based Care Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, 7320Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-9008
University of Tasmania · AUCharles Sturt University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this scoping review is to explore the evidence by which community service providers have integrated reablement models of staff training and client assessment into practice.

backgroundThe concept of reablement, which has emerged during the last two decades globally, has recently been defined by health experts from 11 countries through a Delphi study. Reablement is seen as a way to support integrated frameworks that achieve person-centred, long-term care and assistance across community settings. International research indicates there is some evidence of developing models of reablement that include staff training and individual components of client assessment. However, evidence of integrating reablement into interdisciplinary practice continues to be sparse.

methodsThe review adopted the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) approach. Inclusion criteria for the review related to community care, primary care, long-term care, and residential care. Populations of interest included service providers, interdisciplinary staff, trainers, and assessors.

resultsA total of 11 papers were reviewed. The studies varied in their approach to reablement training and client assessment frameworks. Three studies included assessment of staff well-being. All included evidence-based, person-centred components that can be integrated across health care settings. Single disciplinary approaches were used in all studies and some included training evaluation.

conclusionThis review has identified that currently reablement models are not yet embedded as frameworks for practice by community service providers in primary health care settings. Different programmes of training and assessment are being designed based on single disciplinary approaches and the context in which they are delivered. Further developmental work is required to integrate the components of discipline-specific training programmes within interdisciplinary frameworks. This will achieve not only an integrated framework for delivery across settings but also further the success of 'ageing in place' policy.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesIndependent LivingAgedHumansPrimary Health Careassessmentcommunityframeworksinterdisciplinaryreablementtraining

Identifiers

PMID35197146
PMCPMC8919184
OpenAlexW4213447537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.