Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197093›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2022

A mutation-based gene set predicts survival benefit after immunotherapy across multiple cancers and reveals the immune response landscape.

Junyu Long, Dongxu Wang, Anqiang Wang, Peipei Chen, Yu Lin, Jin Bian, Xu Yang, Mingjun Zheng, Haohai Zhang, Yongchang Zheng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Multi-omics analysis linksTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  4. Long-term Survivors of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A Genomic Predictive Model.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Junyu Long *Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
Dongxu Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Anqiang Wang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Peipei Chen *Department of Clinical Nutrition and Department of Health Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China.
Yu LinShenzhen Withsum Technology Limited, Shenzhen, China.
Jin BianDepartment of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
Xu YangDepartment of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China.
Mingjun ZhengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Haohai ZhangLiver Center and The Transplant Institute, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yongchang ZhengDepartment of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China. zhengyongchang@pumch.cn.
Xinting SangDepartment of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China. sangxt@pumch.cn.
Haitao ZhaoDepartment of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), Beijing, China. zhaoht@pumch.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-8044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of many cancers. However, the limited population that benefits from ICI therapy makes it necessary to screen predictive biomarkers for stratifying patients. Currently, many biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), have been used in the clinic as indicative biomarkers. However, some high-TMB patients with mutations in genes that are closely related to immunotherapeutic resistance are not sensitive to ICI therapy. Thus, there is a need to move beyond TMB and identify specific genetic determinants of the response to ICI therapy. In this study, we established a comprehensive mutation-based gene set across different tumor types to predict the efficacy of ICI therapy.

methodsWe constructed and validated a mutational signature to predict the prognosis of patients treated with ICI therapy. Then, the underlying immune response landscapes of different subtypes were investigated with multidimensional data.

resultsThis study included genomic and clinical data for 12,647 patients. An eleven-gene mutation-based gene set was generated to divide patients into a high-risk group and a low-risk group in a training cohort (1572 patients with 9 types of cancers who were treated with ICI therapy). Validation was performed in a validation cohort (932 patients with 5 types of cancers who were treated with ICI therapy). Mutations in these 11 genes were associated with a better response to ICI therapy. In addition, the mutation-based gene set was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic factor after ICI therapy. We further explored the role of the immune context in determining the benefits of immunotherapy in 10,143 patients with 33 types of cancers and found distinct immune landscapes for the high- and low-risk groups.

conclusionsThe mutation-based gene set developed in this study can be used to reliably predict survival benefit across cancers in patients receiving ICI therapy. The close interplay between the extrinsic and intrinsic immune landscapes in the identified patient subgroups and the subgroups' differing responses to ICI therapy could guide immunotherapy treatment decisions for cancer patients.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunityMutationBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerImmune checkpoint inhibitorImmune responseImmunotherapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35197093
PMCPMC8867854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.