Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197080›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Healthcare resource utilization, total costs, and comorbidities among patients with myotonic dystrophy using U.S. insurance claims data from 2012 to 2019.

Sarah J Howe, David Lapidus, Michael Hull, Jason Yeaw, Tanya Stevenson, Jacinda B Sampson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah J HoweMarigold Foundation, 7515 Flint Road SE, Calgary, AB, T2H 1G3, Canada. sarah.howe@marigoldfoundation.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8578-497X
David LapidusLapidusData Inc., Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Michael HullIQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Jason YeawIQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Tanya StevensonMyotonic Dystrophy Foundation, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jacinda B SampsonStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
IQVIA (United States) · USMyotonic Dystrophy Foundation · USStanford University · USThe Marigold Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM.

resultsA total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640-$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM.

conclusionsThis study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM.

Indexed as

Myotonic DystrophyAdultChild, PreschoolComorbidityDelivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHumansInsurance, HealthRetrospective StudiesCongenital myotonic dystrophyDystrophia myotonicaDystrophyHealthcare costsHealthcare resource utilization (HCRU)Insurance claims databaseMyotonic dystrophy (DM)Myotonic dystrophy type 1Myotonic dystrophy type 2Rare disease

Identifiers

PMID35197080
PMCPMC8867662
OpenAlexW4213130664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.