Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197072›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

The durability, functionality and acceptability of novel screened doors and windows after 4 years of use in a Gambian village: a cross-sectional survey.

Fiona C Shenton, Musa Jawara, Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca, Jakob Knudsen, Umberto D'Alessandro, Steve W Lindsay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiona C ShentonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK. f.c.shenton@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-3480
Musa JawaraMedical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Majo Carrasco-TenezacaDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Jakob KnudsenThe Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture, Design and Conservation, The School of Architecture, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Umberto D'AlessandroMedical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Steve W LindsayDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Durham University · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GMRoyal Danish Academy – Architecture, Design, Conservation · DK

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00532X/1Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends house screening as a tool for malaria control, yet evidence of the long-term durability, functionality and acceptability of this intervention is lacking. In this study, the sustainability and use of novel types of screened doors and windows was examined 4 years after installation in a Gambian village.

methodsA survey of 31 houses, each with two screened doors and two screened windows, was conducted in the rainy season. There were four types of screened door and two types of screened window. Trained staff carried out the survey and interviews of room owners were conducted in the local language before translation into English.

resultsStructurally, the manufactured doors and windows were highly durable and in excellent condition. Most doors shut smoothly 50/61 (82%), although only 25/61 (41%) shut fully automatically with the latch slotting into the hole on the frame and holding fast. Door locks were less robust, with only (24/61) 39% present and working. Blinds proved especially flimsy, with only 4/109 (4%) of door blinds and 10/56 (18%) of window blinds present and in working order. Householders hung curtains inside most doors 50/61 (82%) and in 26/61 (43%) of the windows. Front doors were commonly found propped open 21/31 (68%) and 23/27 (85%) of those with a front door curtain, put their curtains down at night. Doors and windows were well liked, 19/31 (61%) of respondents were happy with them because they kept mosquitoes out 14/31 (45%) and provided security 12/31 (39%). The main reason given for the use of curtains was to provide privacy 26/28 (93% of those with curtains), especially while the door was open or had 'see-through' panels.

conclusionsOverall, the screened doors and windows were in full-working order and undamaged after 4 years of use. The doors and windows were well liked, especially for their ability to reduce the entry of mosquitoes and for the security they afforded. Improvements to the lock design are needed before scale-up. Most householders hung curtains behind their doors for privacy. Installation of screening in buildings should be accompanied with recommendations that at night, when doors and windows are closed, curtains be lifted or drawn to one side-to improve ventilation and keep the house cool.

Indexed as

HousingMalariaAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesGambiaHumansMosquito ControlVentilationAcceptabilityDurabilityFunctionalityHouse screeningThe Gambia

Identifiers

PMID35197072
PMCPMC8867667
OpenAlexW4213365960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.