Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35197018›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention.

Anders Fritz Lerche, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Leon Straker, Karen Søgaard, Andreas Holtermann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Anders Fritz LercheNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. afl@nfa.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-6571
Svend Erik MathiassenCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, 80176, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-6211
Charlotte Lund RasmussenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-5019
Leon StrakerSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-4128
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-6364
Andreas HoltermannNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4825-5697
University of Southern Denmark · DKCurtin University · AUNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Gävle · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers' health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers.

methodsOur implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have 'just right' physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers' health.

trial registrationClinical trial registration was assigned 10-09-2021 (ISRCTN80969503). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80969503.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational HealthFatigueHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStanding PositionWorkplaceGoldilocks Work PrincipleHealthInterventionPhysical Behavior

Identifiers

PMID35197018
PMCPMC8867863
OpenAlexW4212859601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.