Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196916›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

Validation of the Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey-24, Chinese version.

Yuanyuan Wang, Zehui He, Simin Chen, Yuntao Liu, Fang Li, Bruce Barrett, Zhongde Zhang, Guobin Su, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Zehui HeDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Simin ChenDepartment of Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yuntao LiuDepartment of Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Fang LiDepartment of Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Bruce BarrettDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Zhongde ZhangDepartment of Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Guobin SuDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia Stålsby LundborgDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-1861
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey (WURSS) is a validated English questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life and severity of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). We aimed to develop a Mandarin Chinese version of WURSS-24 (WURSS-24-C) and evaluate its reliability, validity and minimal important difference (MID).

methodsThe WURSS-24-C was developed using the forward-backward translation procedure. People with URTIs' symptoms within 48 h of onset were recruited and asked to fill in the WURSS-24-C daily for up to 14 d. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to suggest domains. The 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8) assessing general mental and physical health was used to assess validity. Reliability estimated by Cronbach's alpha and mean day-to-day change for those indicating minimal improvement as MID were evaluated.

resultsThe WURSS-24-C was found to be acceptable, relevant, and easy to complete in cognitive debriefing interviews. A total number of 300 participants (age 28.4 ± 9.3, female 70%) were monitored for 2500 person-days. Four domains (activity and function, systemic symptoms, nasal symptoms and throat symptoms) of the WURSS-24-C were confirmed (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.93). The reliability of this 4-domain-structure is good (Cronbach's alphas varied from 0.849 to 0.943). Convergent validity is moderate (Pearson correlation coefficients between daily WURSS-24-C and the SF-8 were -0.780 and -0.721, for the SF-8 physical and mental health, respectively). Estimates of MID for individual items varied from -0.41 to -1.14.

conclusionsThe WURSS-24-C is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing illness-specific quality-of-life health status in Chinese-speaking patients with URTIs.Key messagesThe Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey (WURSS) series are patient-oriented questionnaire instruments assessing the quality of life and severity of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).The WURSS-24 was translated into Mandarin Chinese using the forward-backward translation procedure, and evaluated its validity, reliability and minimal important difference (MID) in 300 Chinese participants with URTIs.The WURSS-24 Chinese version (WURSS-24-C) seems to be a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing illness-specific quality-of-life health status in Chinese patients with URTIs.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultChinaFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesWisconsinYoung Adultcommon coldpsychometricsquality of lifereliabilityupper respiratory infectionvalidationWURSS

Identifiers

PMID35196916
PMCPMC8881074
OpenAlexW4220822337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.