Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196835›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2022

Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training

Ayşe Bozkurt Oflaz, Banu Turgut Öztürk, Şaban Gönül, Berker Bakbak, Şansal Gedik, Süleyman Okudan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05904444 (The Effect of Duration Between Sessions on Microperimetric Biofeedback Training in Patients With Maculopathies), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05904444 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Duration Between Sessions on Microperimetric Biofeedback Training in Patients With Maculopathies

TypeinterventionalSponsorAier Eye Hospital, GuangzhouRan2018 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsMacular Degeneration, Low Vision, Stargardt DiseaseArmsmicroperimetric biofeedback training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayşe Bozkurt OflazUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5894-0220
Banu Turgut ÖztürkSelçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0702-6951
Şaban GönülSelçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0803-1197
Berker BakbakSelçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7034-8040
Şansal GedikSelçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9509-0832
Süleyman OkudanSelçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Konya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9491-1459
Selçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated acoustic biofeedback training using microperimetry in patients with foveal scars and an eligible retinal locus for better fixation. Materials and Methods: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The acoustic biofeedback training module in the MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment, CenterVue®, Italy) microperimeter was used for training. To determine the treatment efficacy, the following variables were compared before and after testing: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); MAIA microperimeter full threshold 4-2 test parameters of average threshold value, fixation parameters P1 and P2, and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 63% and 95% of fixation points; contrast sensitivity (CSV 1000E Contrast Sensitivity Test); reading speed using the Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test (MNREAD reading chart); and quality of life (NEI-VFQ-25). In addition, fixation stability parameters were recorded during each session. Results: The study group consisted of 29 patients with a mean age of 68.72±8.34 years. Median BCVA was initially 0.8 (0.2-1.6) logMAR and was 0.8 (0.1-1.6) logMAR after 8 weeks of preferred retinal locus training (p=0.003). The fixation stability parameter P1 improved from a mean of 21.28±3.08% to 32.69±3.69% (p=0.001) while mean P2 improved from 52.79±4.53% to 68.31±3.89% (p=0.001). Mean BCEA 63% decreased from 16.11±2.27 Conclusion: Beginning with the fifth session, biofeedback training for a new trained retinal locus improved average sensitivity, fixation stability, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and quality of life in patients with macular scarring.

Indexed as

Vision, LowVisual FieldsAgedFixation, OcularHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeVisual AcuityLow vision rehabilitationmicroperimetrypreferred retinal locus training

Identifiers

PMID35196835
PMCPMC8876780
OpenAlexW4206223580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.