Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196748›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2022

Reliability and Validity of the Subjective Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire for Parkinson's Disease (SCCQ-PD).

Jeongmin Ko, Joonyoung Ha, Jae Jung Lee, Sunjin Jin, Jongwoo Lee, Min Seok Baek, Jin Yong Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Subjective cognitive complaints in cognitively unimpaired Parkinson's disease: Associations with affective burden, motor severity, and awareness-related processes.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeongmin KoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-4014
Joonyoung HaDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-3995
Jae Jung LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-1564
Sunjin JinDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-5434
Jongwoo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-5839
Min Seok BaekDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5250-9480
Jin Yong HongDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. mlunoilu@hanmail.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-3737

Funding

Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSubjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) are gaining attention as a self-perceived symptom for cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), but there are few suitable tools for assessing SCCs in PD. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing SCCs in PD, called the Subjective Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire for Parkinson's Disease (SCCQ-PD).

methodsThe SCCQ-PD consists of 12 yes/no questions on subjective cognitive function, and the questionnaire was completed by patients with PD (score-P) and their caregivers (score-C). The cognitive function of patients was examined using comprehensive neuropsychological tests.

resultsThis study included 73 patients (38 cognitively normal, 25 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 10 demented) and their caregivers. Score-P and score-C had excellent reliability (Kuder-Richardson formula 20 coefficients of 0.893 and 0.931, respectively), and the scores exhibited a strong intercorrelation. Both score-P and score-C were negatively correlated with cognitive performance, and both were excellent in discriminating demented patients from those with normal cognition or MCI (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 and 0.88, respectively).

conclusionsThe SCCQ-PD is a reliable tool for assessing SCCs in patients with PD. SCCs measured using the SCCQ-PD are correlated with objective cognitive decline and useful for discriminating demented patients from nondemented patients.

Indexed as

cognitioncognitive declineParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID35196748
PMCPMC8926760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.