Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196710›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Context free and context-dependent conceptual representation in the brain.

Zhiyao Gao, Li Zheng, André Gouws, Katya Krieger-Redwood, Xiuyi Wang, Dominika Varga, Jonathan Smallwood, Elizabeth Jefferies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hippocampal contributions to novel spatial learning are both age-related and age-invariant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Syntactic processing engages the semantic control network.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhiyao GaoDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, NY YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-8096
Li ZhengDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-4353
André GouwsDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, NY YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-7829
Katya Krieger-RedwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, NY YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-1168
Xiuyi WangDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, NY YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-6229
Dominika VargaSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5851-0498
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-2459
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, NY YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-4330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How concepts are coded in the brain is a core issue in cognitive neuroscience. Studies have focused on how individual concepts are processed, but the way in which conceptual representation changes to suit the context is unclear. We parametrically manipulated the association strength between words, presented in pairs one word at a time using a slow event-related fMRI design. We combined representational similarity analysis and computational linguistics to probe the neurocomputational content of these trials. Individual word meaning was maintained in supramarginal gyrus (associated with verbal short-term memory) when items were judged to be unrelated, but not when a linking context was retrieved. Context-dependent meaning was instead represented in left lateral prefrontal gyrus (associated with controlled retrieval), angular gyrus, and ventral temporal lobe (regions associated with integrative aspects of memory). Analyses of informational connectivity, examining the similarity of activation patterns across trials between sites, showed that control network regions had more similar multivariate responses across trials when association strength was weak, reflecting a common controlled retrieval state when the task required more unusual associations. These findings indicate that semantic control and representational sites amplify contextually relevant meanings in trials judged to be related.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingParietal LobeTemporal Lobeconceptual representationcontext-dependent meaningcontext-invariant meaningfMRIrepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35196710
PMCPMC9758583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.