Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196605›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2022

The approval and withdrawal of melphalan flufenamide (melflufen): Implications for the state of the FDA.

Timothée Olivier, Vinay Prasad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tumor-Selective and Chemical Activation Strategies for Nitrogen Mustard Prodrugs.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for multiple myeloma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Peptide cargo administration: current state and applications.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Peptide Drug Conjugates and Their Role in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Value in Myeloma Care: Myth or Reality.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Timothée OlivierDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: Timothee.olivier@hcuge.ch.
Vinay PrasadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In October 2021, melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) was withdrawn from the US market for the treatment of multiple myeloma. The decision occurred based on results from a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) which showed numerically inferior overall survival, which previously led the FDA to halt all trials involving this drug. We highlight four issues raised by the approval fate of melflufen. First, the OCEAN trial was designed with a substandard control arm: negative results occurred despite this bias theoretically favoring the experimental arm. Second, a new compound, derived from a well-known drug, is not well fitting the accelerated pathway principles, unless being robustly tested against its parent drug. Third and four, allowing a new compound on the market, while there are known alternatives, and imminent confirmatory data, has the potential to harm patients while bringing earlier market share and profit to the company. While the FDA and the company should be commended for pushing a potentially dangerous product off the US market despite recent approval, yet a re-evaluation of regulatory processes is needed to ensure that cancer patients have timely access to effective medications while being protected against potentially detrimental ones.

Indexed as

FDA approvalhealth policymultiple myelomatrials

Identifiers

PMID35196605
PMCPMC8866737
OpenAlexW4213313688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.