ArticleNeuroImage2022
Deep learning identifies brain structures that predict cognition and explain heterogeneity in cognitive aging.
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent white matter metabolic signature patterns indicate impending cognitive decline in aging and dementia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Early subacute frontal callosal microstructure and language outcomes after stroke.Brain communications · 2025Article
- The volume and the distribution of premorbid white matter hyperintensities: Impact on post-stroke aphasia.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Quantitative estimate of cognitive resilience and its medical and genetic associations.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Decoding degeneration: the implementation of machine learning for clinical detection of neurodegenerative disorders.Neural regeneration research · 2023Review
- Deep learning interpretability in neuroimaging: A comprehensive survey and methodological recommendations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Specific brain structures (gray matter regions and white matter tracts) play a dominant role in determining cognitive decline and explain the heterogeneity in cognitive aging. Identification of these structures is crucial for screening of older adults at risk of cognitive decline. Using deep learning models augmented with a model-interpretation technique on data from 1432 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants, we identified a subset of brain structures that were most predictive of individualized cognitive trajectories and indicative of cognitively resilient vs. vulnerable individuals. Specifically, these structures explained why some participants were resilient to the deleterious effects of elevated brain amyloid and poor vascular health. Of these, medial temporal lobe and fornix, reflective of age and pathology-related degeneration, and corpus callosum, reflective of inter-hemispheric disconnection, accounted for 60% of the heterogeneity explained by the most predictive structures. Our results are valuable for identifying cognitively vulnerable individuals and for developing interventions for cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.