Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196406›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

Hormone therapy and disease activity in Danish women with multiple sclerosis: A population-based cohort study.

Tine Iskov Kopp, Øjvind Lidegaard, Melinda Magyari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Neurology of Menopause.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Impact of sex on multiple sclerosis therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. The influence of menopause on multiple sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hormonal Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: a Review of Clinical Data.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tine Iskov KoppDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3729-4420
Øjvind LidegaardDepartment of Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Melinda MagyariDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSex differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence and disease course are thought to be driven by hormones. Exogenous exposure to estrogens may affect MS disease course. Thus, our aim was to investigate the association between hormone therapy (HT) and disease activity and disability accrual among women with MS.

methodsA register-based cohort study was conducted with prospectively enrolled cases from the Danish MS registry. Information on hormone exposure was retrieved from the National Prescription Registry. Outcomes were relapse rate, relapse rate ratio, recurrent relapses, 6-month confirmed and sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones 4 and 6, and recurrent EDSS worsening.

resultsIn all, 3325 women were eligible for analyses, of whom 333 (10%) were ever on HT at some time during follow-up. We found no association between HT and disability accrual, although a trend for increasing risk with increasing length of use was seen. The risk of reaching 6-month confirmed and sustained EDSS 4 among users was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3-1.2) after <1 year of use and 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9-2.2) after >5 years of HT compared to never use. The risk of recurrent relapse was increased by 20% (95% CI = 1.0-1.4) among current users of HT compared to nonusers. However, the risk of recurrent relapses was driven by the first calendar period (1996-2005) before the introduction of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy.

conclusionsOur findings from this nationwide MS population suggest that HT does not affect disability accrual in women with MS, especially if used for <5 years.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingCohort StudiesDenmarkDisease ProgressionFemaleHormonesHumansMaleRecurrenceHormonescohort studyhormone therapymenopausemultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35196406
PMCPMC9314629
OpenAlexW4213414255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.