Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196404›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Toward 3D dose verification of an electronic brachytherapy source with a plastic scintillation detector.

Peter Georgi, Gustavo Kertzscher, Lars Nyvang, Jaroslav Šolc, Thorsten Schneider, Kari Tanderup, Jacob Graversen Johansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter GeorgiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gustavo KertzscherDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Lars NyvangDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jaroslav ŠolcPhoton Dosimetry Laboratory, Czech Metrology Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
Thorsten SchneiderDivision for Ionizing Radiation, WG 6.34 "Dosimetry for Brachytherapy and Beta Radiation Protection", Physicalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany.
Kari TanderupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jacob Graversen JohansenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

EMPIR from Participating States and from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme 18NRM02 PRISM-eBTNovo Nordisk Fonden NNF19OC0058756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic brachytherapy (eBT) is considered a safe treatment with good outcomes. However, eBT lacks standardized and independent dose verification, which could impede future use. PURPOSE: To validate the 3D dose-to-water distribution of an electronic brachytherapy (eBT) source using a small-volume plastic scintillation detector (PSD).

methodsThe relative dose distribution of a Papillon 50 (P50) (Ariane Medical Systems, UK) eBT source was measured in water with a PSD consisting of a cylindrical scintillating BCF-12 fiber (length: 0.5 mm, Ø: 1 mm) coupled to a photodetector via an optical fiber. The measurements were performed with the PSD mounted on a motorized stage in a water phantom (MP3) (PTW, Germany). This allowed the sensitive volume of the PSD to be moved to predetermined positions relative to the P50 applicator, which pointed vertically downward while just breaching the water surface. The percentage depth-dose (PDD) was measured from 0 to 50 mm source-to-detector distance (SDD) in 1-3 mm steps. Dose profiles were measured along two perpendicular axes at five different SDDs with step sizes down to 0.5 mm. Characterization of the PSD consisted of determining the energy correction through Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and by measuring the stability and dose rate linearity using a well-type ionization chamber as a reference. The measured PDD and profiles were validated with corresponding MC simulations.

resultsThe measured and simulated PDD curves agreed within 2% (except at 0 mm and 43 mm depth) after the PSD measurements were corrected for energy dependency. The absorbed dose decreased by a factor of 2 at 7 mm depth and by a factor of 10 at 26 mm depth. The measured dose profiles showed dose gradients at the profile edges of more than 50%/mm at 5 mm depth and 15%/mm at 50 mm depth. The measured profile widths increased 0.66 mm per 1 mm depth, while the simulated profile widths increased 0.74 mm per 1 mm depth. An azimuthal dependency of > 10% was observed in the dose at 10 mm distance from the beam center. The total uncertainty of the measured relative dose is < 2.5% with a positional uncertainty of 0.4 mm. The measurements for a full 3D dose characterization (PDD and profiles) can be carried out within 8 h, the limiting factor being cooling of the P50.

conclusionThe PSD and MP3 water phantoms provided a method to independently verify the relative 3D dose distribution in water of an eBT source.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyElectronicsMonte Carlo MethodPlasticsRadiometryWaterPlasticsWaterdose verificationelectronic brachytherapyMonte Carlo dosimetryplastic scintillators

Identifiers

PMID35196404
PMCPMC9314913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.