Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196313›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sexual harassment in secondary school: Prevalence and ambiguities. A mixed methods study in Scottish schools.

Helen Sweeting, Carolyn Blake, Julie Riddell, Simon Barrett, Kirstin R Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen SweetingMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3321-5732
Carolyn BlakeMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Julie RiddellMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Simon BarrettMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-2999
Kirstin R MitchellMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is characterized by identity formation, exploration and initiation of intimate relationships. Much of this occurs at school, making schools key sites of sexual harassment. Schools often lack awareness and understanding of the issue, and UK research on the topic is scarce. We explored prevalence and perceptions of sexual harassment in a school-based mixed-methods study of 13-17 year-old Scottish adolescents.

methodsA student survey (N = 638) assessed past 3-months school-based victimization and perpetration prevalence via 17 behavioral items based on the most commonly used school-based sexual harassment measure ('Hostile Hallways'). Eighteen focus groups (N = 119 students) explored which of 10 behaviors were perceived as harassing/unacceptable and why.

resultsTwo-thirds reported any victimization: 64.7% 'visual/verbal' (e.g. sexual jokes) and 34.3% 'contact/personally-invasive' behaviors (e.g. sexual touching; most of whom also reported experiencing visual/verbal types) in the past 3-months. Data suggested a gateway effect, such that contact/personally-invasive behaviors are more likely to be reported by those also reporting more common visual/verbal behaviors. Some survey participants reported being unsure about whether they had experienced certain behaviors; and in focus groups, participants expressed uncertainty regarding the acceptability of most behaviors. Ambiguities centered on behavioral context and enactment including: degree of pressure, persistence and physicality; degree of familiarity between the instigator-recipient; and perception of the instigator's intent. In attempting to resolve ambiguities, students applied normative schemas underpinned by rights (to dignity, respect and equality) and 'knowingness', usually engendered by friendship.

conclusionsOur study confirms school-based sexual harassment is common but also finds significant nuance in the ways in which students distinguish between acceptable and harassing. School-based strategies to tackle sexual harassment must engage with this complexity.

Indexed as

SchoolsStudentsAdolescentCrime VictimsFemaleFocus GroupsGender-Based ViolenceHumansMalePilot ProjectsPrevalenceScotlandSelf ReportSexual HarassmentVerbal Behavior

Identifiers

PMID35196313
PMCPMC8865636
OpenAlexW4212779230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.