Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196209›Full record

ArticleGerontology & geriatrics education

Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Macy Stockdill, Bailey Hendricks, Michael D Barnett, Marie Bakitas, Caroline N Harada

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology & geriatrics education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bringing the Teaching Close to Home: Implementation of a Near-Peer Model for Introductory Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Lecture Series.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Macy StockdillSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-6002
Bailey HendricksCollege of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Center for Nursing Science Rm 5094 | 985330 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8822-9085
Michael D BarnettSchool of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Marie BakitasSchool of Nursing, and Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2913-2053
Caroline N HaradaSchool of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USNebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Influence of Race, Gender, Rurality, and Dyadic Health on Symptom Trajectories in Persons with Advanced Heart FailureF31NR018782 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI STOCKDILL, MACY L · 2019 to 2021
$63k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician faculty learn teaching skills informally while fighting competing professional obligations. One underutilized proven technique to improve teaching skills is peer observation with feedback. We aimed to understand benefits and challenges of a physician faculty development program based on peer observation of teaching and to develop best practice recommendations for future program development. The authors developed a peer observation-based physician faculty development program from 2015 to 2017. Two interviewers conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with 13 faculty participants and four non-participants using content analysis to identify themes and subthemes in NVivo©. Participant-identified program benefits included conveyed institutional support for teaching, the opportunity for peer observation with direct and timely feedback, the opportunity for community building, and overall program feasibility. Program challenges included competing scheduling demands, variability in feedback quality, and difficulty maintaining engagement for the program duration. Potential areas for improvement included participation incentives, external faculty involvement, assistance with program logistics and administration, and improvement in the consistency of the feedback experience. While peer observation is a valued approach to physician faculty development of teaching skills, competing demands on physicians may still limit program effectiveness. Program sustainability depends on optimizing feedback quality, boosting motivation for participation, and providing administrative support.

Indexed as

GeriatricsPhysiciansFaculty, MedicalHumansLearningPeer GroupTeachingcommunity of educatorsfaculty developmentfeedbackPeer observation

Identifiers

PMID35196209
PMCPMC9395544
OpenAlexW4212847857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.