Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196158›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

A separable neural code in monkey IT enables perfect CAPTCHA decoding.

Harish Katti, S P Arun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shape and word parts combine linearly in the Bouba-Kiki effect.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using compositionality to understand parts in whole objects.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harish KattiCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4223-0325
S P ArunCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-5066
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance (India Alliance) 500027/Z/09/Z and IA/S/17/1/503081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading distorted letters is easy for us but so challenging for the machine vision that it is used on websites as CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing Test to tell Computers and Humans Apart). How does our brain solve this problem? One solution is to have neurons selective for letter combinations but invariant to distortions. Another is for neurons to encode letter distortions and longer strings to enable separable decoding. Here, we provide evidence for the latter possibility using neural recordings in the monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Neural responses to distorted strings were explained better as a product (but not sum) of shape and distortion tuning, whereas by contrast, responses to letter combinations were explained better as a sum (but not product) of letters. These two rules were sufficient for perfect CAPTCHA decoding and were also emergent in neural networks trained for word recognition. Thus, a separable neural code enables efficient letter recognition.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerReadingAnimalsHaplorhiniPattern Recognition, VisualSoftwareTemporal Lobedecodingneural mechanismsobject recognitionreading

Identifiers

PMID35196158
PMCPMC8957334
OpenAlexW4221047508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.